Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3

[Lennart Borgman]

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 14:13, Jambunathan K <address@hidden> wrote:
> Jambunathan K <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> Martin recently introduced the command names
>>>
>>>   split-window-above-each-other -> C-x 2
>>>   split-window-side-by-side     -> C-x 3
>>>
>>> for which split-window-{vertically|horizontally} are now aliases.
>>
>> How about:
>>
>> split-window-and-stack-horizontally
>> split-window-and-stack-vertically
>>
>> or
>>
>> split-window-and-arrange-horizontally
>> split-window-and-arrange-vertically
>
> I like Tim's suggestion.
>
> Another variation of my earlier suggestion would be
>
> split-window-and-tile-horizontally
> split-window-and-tile-vertically
>
> Since windows are always tiled but never stacked or arranged, so to
> speak.

Why do we need new names? Are not those introduced by Martin very
clear and good?