[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint
From: |
Nix |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 21:34:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
On 25 Oct 2011, Stefan Monnier stated:
>>> If this output does not explain the process's size you're seeing, then
>>> we have a leak in the C code somewhere.
>> Oh yes.
>
> Do you use the libgnutls bindings, by any chance?
Yes.
> If so, can you try to avoid using it and just stick to
> gnutls-cli instead?
It looks like doing that is a simple matter of compiling it out and
open-network-stream will fall back automatically, so, sure, I'll do
that next time I rebuild (probably tomorrow), let it run for a few
days, and see if it bloats.
--
NULL && (void)
- Re: valgrind warnings [Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint], (continued)
- Re: valgrind warnings [Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint], Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/29
- Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint, Sven Joachim, 2011/10/22
- Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint, Carsten Mattner, 2011/10/22
- Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/23
- Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint, Nix, 2011/10/25
- Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint, Stefan Monnier, 2011/10/25
- Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint,
Nix <=
- gnutls memory leak [Was: Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint], Chong Yidong, 2011/10/26
- Re: gnutls memory leak [Was: Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint], Chong Yidong, 2011/10/27
- Re: gnutls memory leak [Was: Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint], Ted Zlatanov, 2011/10/27
- Re: gnutls memory leak [Was: Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint], Ted Zlatanov, 2011/10/28
- Re: gnutls memory leak [Was: Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint], Nix, 2011/10/28
- Re: gnutls memory leak [Was: Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint], Ted Zlatanov, 2011/10/27
Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint, Dan Nicolaescu, 2011/10/13
Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint, Carsten Mattner, 2011/10/14
Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint, James Cloos, 2011/10/14