[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patch for fields of `struct buffer'
|
From: |
Miles Bader |
|
Subject: |
Re: Patch for fields of `struct buffer' |
|
Date: |
Sat, 29 Jan 2011 11:34:08 +0900 |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> B_(buf, XXXX)
>
> That sounds even better, yes.
If by "better" you mean "less readable and more confusing"...
The BUF_xxxx(b) syntax may be slightly more verbose, but it's very
familiar and idiomatic.
-Miles
--
Christian, n. One who follows the teachings of Christ so long as they are not
inconsistent with a life of sin.
- Re: Patch for fields of `struct buffer', (continued)
Re: Patch for fields of `struct buffer', Stefan Monnier, 2011/01/28
Re: Patch for fields of `struct buffer', Kim F. Storm, 2011/01/28
Re: Patch for fields of `struct buffer', Richard Stallman, 2011/01/29
- Re: Patch for fields of `struct buffer', Tom Tromey, 2011/01/30
- Re: Patch for fields of `struct buffer', Stefan Monnier, 2011/01/30
- Re: Patch for fields of `struct buffer', Tom Tromey, 2011/01/31
- Re: Patch for fields of `struct buffer', Stefan Monnier, 2011/01/31
- Re: Patch for fields of `struct buffer', Tom Tromey, 2011/01/31
- Re: Patch for fields of `struct buffer', Stefan Monnier, 2011/01/31
- Re: Patch for fields of `struct buffer', Tom Tromey, 2011/01/31
- Re: Patch for fields of `struct buffer', Stefan Monnier, 2011/01/31