[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default
|
From: |
Deniz Dogan |
|
Subject: |
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default |
|
Date: |
Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:23:47 +0200 |
2010/10/7 Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>:
>
> This was discussed briefly a few years ago and Stefan (and other
> people) agreed with it: how about we map ibuffer to C-x C-b by default
> in Emacs-24?
>
> ibuffer is a superset of list-buffers, and it provides many things
> that list-buffers does not.
>
>
If a significant majority of experienced Emacs users prefer to use
ibuffer instead of list-buffers (which is what I believe) what is the
problem with making this change?
--
Deniz Dogan
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Juri Linkov, 2010/10/07
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default,
Deniz Dogan <=
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, David Kastrup, 2010/10/08
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Deniz Dogan, 2010/10/08
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, David Kastrup, 2010/10/08
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Deniz Dogan, 2010/10/08
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Deniz Dogan, 2010/10/08
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, David Kastrup, 2010/10/08
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Lennart Borgman, 2010/10/08
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, René Kyllingstad, 2010/10/08
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Roland Winkler, 2010/10/08