[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core
From: |
Daniel Colascione |
Subject: |
Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Oct 2010 10:33:48 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 |
On 10/3/2010 7:03 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> Whatever the current/existing rationales may be, surely _some_ will
> cease to be relevant by any reasonably sane justification in lieu of
> lexically scoped environments.
>
> I don't think that relates to this issue.
> This issue is about global names.
>
_What_ global names? cl.el is _already_ widely used. What symbols
actually cause a problem _in practice_, _today_?
- Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, (continued)
Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, MON KEY, 2010/10/02
Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core,
Daniel Colascione <=
Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Richard Stallman, 2010/10/05
Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Helmut Eller, 2010/10/05
Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/10/05
Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Richard Stallman, 2010/10/06
Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/10/07
Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Karl Fogel, 2010/10/07
Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Richard Stallman, 2010/10/08
Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/10/05
Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Richard Stallman, 2010/10/06
Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Daniel Colascione, 2010/10/07