Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core

[David Kastrup]

Daniel Colascione <address@hidden> writes:

> On 9/30/2010 8:16 PM, Miles Bader wrote:
>> Daniel Colascione <address@hidden> writes:
>>> CL really should be dumped along with Emacs proper.
>> 
>> cl.el is a combination of good useful things that and horrible ugly
>> things (this isn't a comment on the CL language, btw -- many of the
>> problems with cl.el are issue with its implementation and consistency
>> with elisp).
>
> Can you point to a few examples? Parts of cl are ugly (the common use of
> make-symbol instead of gensym, for example, makes macroexpansions
> difficult to read). But those don't affect functionality or interaction
> with other packages.

That should be possible to solve with lex-bind.

-- 
David Kastrup