[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Status of IPA patch?
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: Status of IPA patch? |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Aug 2009 22:06:54 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
> > (Is there any other major software to be compatible with?)
>
> Well, SCIM, but that’s not really major. My friend Clint, here:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=499558 preferred the script
> G when he adapted the Kirshenbaum method to SCIM, and didn’t offere a
> choice; if anyone has an SCIM install, I’d be curious as to what that does
> with its X-SAMPA input.
Both X-SAMPA and Kirshenbaum SCIM inputs use U+0261 for `g'.
IPA-X-SAMPA:
g ɡ 0 # U+0261 LATIN SMALL LETTER SCRIPT G
IPA-Kirshenbaum:
g ɡ 0 # U+0261 LATIN SMALL LETTER SCRIPT G
I see no reason to deviate from this standard in Emacs.
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Aidan Kehoe, 2009/08/25
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Glenn Morris, 2009/08/25
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/27
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Aidan Kehoe, 2009/08/27
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Aidan Kehoe, 2009/08/28
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Miles Bader, 2009/08/28
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Aidan Kehoe, 2009/08/28
- Re: Status of IPA patch?,
Juri Linkov <=
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Aidan Kehoe, 2009/08/28
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/28
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/28
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/28