[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:52:35 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> But as regards ~/xmail vs ~/XMAIL for the default, ISTR that during
> the transition to mbox format I saw an advantage in making the default
> different. But in fact the current Rmail deals just fine with saving
> into Babyl files, so I now think it is better to keep the default
> unchanged from Emacs 22.
Fine by me. Alfred, if you like, go ahead and switch to XMAIL on the
trunk and branch.
- rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/07/06
- Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file, Glenn Morris, 2009/07/09
- Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/07/09
- Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file, Chong Yidong, 2009/07/09
- Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/07/10
- Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file, Chong Yidong, 2009/07/12
- Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/12
- Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file,
Chong Yidong <=
- Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/07/13
- Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file, Chong Yidong, 2009/07/13
- Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/07/15