[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Jul 2009 15:41:45 -0400 |
> rmail files have always uppercase, so it makes it easy to list just
> them with `ls *MAIL*'. I find it also very confusing that `o' now
> outputs to ~/xmail, when I have a ~/XMAIL that I use.
I have a habit of saving messages in files called xmail/foo.xmail, etc.,
all being lower case. Since these file names are entered solely
by users, I think we cannot assume they all follow any rule.
But as regards ~/xmail vs ~/XMAIL for the default, ISTR that during
the transition to mbox format I saw an advantage in making the default
different. But in fact the current Rmail deals just fine with saving
into Babyl files, so I now think it is better to keep the default
unchanged from Emacs 22.
- rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/07/06
- Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file, Glenn Morris, 2009/07/09
- Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/07/09
- Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file, Chong Yidong, 2009/07/09
- Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/07/10
- Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file, Chong Yidong, 2009/07/12
- Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file, Chong Yidong, 2009/07/12
- Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/07/13
- Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file, Chong Yidong, 2009/07/13
- Re: rmail-default-file vs. (deleted) rmail-default-rmail-file, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/07/15