[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done? |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Dec 2008 14:55:08 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
> OK, I have some ideas on how to make this work. I will do a bit of
> experimenting and see what I can come up with. I've played around with
> branches where I have moved files around and bzr merges that just fine.
> This should (hopefully) just be an extreme example.
The main issue is that the two branches will probably not share a common
ancestor at first. Typically the problem is keeping track of file
identities: in the Gnus repository lisp/gnus.el will have one identity
and in Emacs's lisp/gnus/gnus.el will have another, so convincing Bzr
that those two files correspond to each other may simply be impossible
(in Arch, the identity is user-visible, set in the "arch-tag:" line or
in the .arch-ids-<file>.id file, so matching the two is not difficult).
Stefan
- Switching to bzr: what remains to be done?, (continued)
- Switching to bzr: what remains to be done?, Karl Fogel, 2008/12/08
- Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/08
- Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/12/08
- Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/08
- Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done?, Karl Fogel, 2008/12/11
- Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done?, Karl Fogel, 2008/12/17
- Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done?, Tassilo Horn, 2008/12/18
- Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done?, Karl Fogel, 2008/12/18
- Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done?, Tassilo Horn, 2008/12/19
- Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done?, Giorgos Keramidas, 2008/12/19
- Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/18