[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:37:57 +0300 |
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:48:34 +0200
>
> Well, the whole difference between exit (or maybe _exit?) and abort is
> the core dump, and that is why abort rather than exit is also called on
> failed assertions. So debugging is the whole point of abort and
> declaring it in a way that precludes debugging is a bit pointless.
And even if they disagree about this, GCC and glibc could have behaved
differently under -g.
- Post-mortem debugging and abort, David Kastrup, 2008/06/13
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/06/13
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, David Kastrup, 2008/06/13
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/06/13
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, David Kastrup, 2008/06/13
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, Richard M Stallman, 2008/06/14
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/06/14
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, David Kastrup, 2008/06/14
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/06/14
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, Richard M Stallman, 2008/06/15
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, David Kastrup, 2008/06/14
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, Richard M Stallman, 2008/06/14
Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, Tom Tromey, 2008/06/13