[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:04:11 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
Eli> Sigh. I concluded a long time ago that it is useless to ask GCC and
Eli> glibc developers to cater to debugging needs. At best, you are
Eli> ignored; but more often you are flamed back into silence. I'm sorry
Eli> that you, David, wasted your effort as well on this.
FWIW on the GCC side there is a renewed awareness of the needs of
debuggers. There are a couple competing proposals for better
debuginfo; they are both being presented at the GCC Summit next week.
So, I encourage folks to report GCC bugs in this area. I can't
guarantee that nobody will be rude -- though this seems to happen less
often nowadays.
Tom
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, (continued)
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/06/13
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, David Kastrup, 2008/06/13
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, Richard M Stallman, 2008/06/14
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/06/14
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, David Kastrup, 2008/06/14
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/06/14
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, Richard M Stallman, 2008/06/15
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/06/14
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, David Kastrup, 2008/06/14
- Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort, Richard M Stallman, 2008/06/14
Re: Post-mortem debugging and abort,
Tom Tromey <=