[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: face-remapping-alist client code
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: face-remapping-alist client code |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Jun 2008 13:23:50 -0700 |
> > This probably implies that it makes more sense with defvar
> > rather than with defcustom.
>
> Buffer-local variables should generally not be mixed with defcustom,
> because custom doesn't know what to do with it. It won't
> collapse, but the user may be disappointed.
Why don't you document that, if it's not already documented?
- Re: face-remapping-alist client code, (continued)
- Re: face-remapping-alist client code, David Reitter, 2008/06/02
- Re: face-remapping-alist client code, Miles Bader, 2008/06/02
- RE: face-remapping-alist client code, Drew Adams, 2008/06/02
- Re: face-remapping-alist client code, Miles Bader, 2008/06/02
- Re: face-remapping-alist client code, Miles Bader, 2008/06/02
- Re: face-remapping-alist client code, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/06/02
- Re: face-remapping-alist client code, Miles Bader, 2008/06/02
- Re: face-remapping-alist client code, David Kastrup, 2008/06/02
- Re: face-remapping-alist client code, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/02
- RE: face-remapping-alist client code,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: face-remapping-alist client code, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/06/02
- Re: face-remapping-alist client code, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/02
- RE: face-remapping-alist client code, Drew Adams, 2008/06/02
Re: face-remapping-alist client code, Chong Yidong, 2008/06/02