[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: face-remapping-alist client code
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: face-remapping-alist client code |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Jun 2008 17:39:07 +0200 |
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Miles Bader <address@hidden> wrote:
> I somehow got the impression that make-variable-buffer-local was frowned
> upon. Dunno if it's true.
As David has said, it depends on whether the variable is going to have
a sensible default that can be often used without resorting to making
it buffer-local. But I think that's not the case here.
> I think the lighters are actually quite useful. It's nice to have an
> explicit reminders of active modes as well as implicit (and sometimes
> subtle) ones.
Oh, I think we are on extreme opposites here. I tend to remove
lighters, or at the very least reduce them to the minimum possible
expression (one-char).
Juanma
- Re: face-remapping-alist client code, (continued)
- Re: face-remapping-alist client code, Miles Bader, 2008/06/02
- RE: face-remapping-alist client code, Drew Adams, 2008/06/02
- Re: face-remapping-alist client code, Miles Bader, 2008/06/02
- Re: face-remapping-alist client code, Miles Bader, 2008/06/02
- Re: face-remapping-alist client code, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/06/02
- Re: face-remapping-alist client code, Miles Bader, 2008/06/02
- Re: face-remapping-alist client code, David Kastrup, 2008/06/02
- Re: face-remapping-alist client code, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/02
- RE: face-remapping-alist client code, Drew Adams, 2008/06/02
- Re: face-remapping-alist client code,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: face-remapping-alist client code, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/02
- RE: face-remapping-alist client code, Drew Adams, 2008/06/02
Re: face-remapping-alist client code, Chong Yidong, 2008/06/02