[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: using empty_string as the only "" string
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: using empty_string as the only "" string |
|
Date: |
Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:00:35 -0400 |
Also note that canonicalization of null strings assumes that
non-null interval can't be attached to empty string regardless of
it's multibyteness (at a first glance, this is how the stuff ticks
now, but I'm not sure about this).
Alas, I don't understand those words.
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, (continued)
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/24
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, dmantipov, 2007/04/25
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/26
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, Dmitry Antipov, 2007/04/26
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, Dmitry Antipov, 2007/04/27
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, David Kastrup, 2007/04/27
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/28
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, Dmitry Antipov, 2007/04/28
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/28