[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: using empty_string as the only "" string
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: using empty_string as the only "" string |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:50:46 +0200 |
On 4/25/07, dmantipov <address@hidden> wrote:
b) Emacs isn't a CL
and should not obey CLtL2 completely, isn't it ?
I hope most CLs you use obey ANSI X3.226-1994, not CLtL2 :)
But anyway, I suggested elisp to continue to be compatible with
itself** not with CL.
Juanma
**elisp, like Perl, is a one-implementation language, so grey areas in
the docs are implicitly defined by the interpreter's behaviour. Not
that they cannot be changed, of course; but doing so shouldn't be done
lightly.
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, (continued)
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/24
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/24
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, dmantipov, 2007/04/25
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, Miles Bader, 2007/04/25
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, Kenichi Handa, 2007/04/25
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/26
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, Dmitry Antipov, 2007/04/26
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/27
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, Dmitry Antipov, 2007/04/27
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, David Kastrup, 2007/04/27
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/28
- Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, Dmitry Antipov, 2007/04/28