Re: address@hidden: misbehaviour of outline-backward-same-level]

[Leo]

----- Me (2007-04-13) wrote:-----

>> since there is no superior level for the top-level, the current
>> behavior seems reasonable.  it is analogous to what happens when you
>> hold down `C-M-a' in ~/.emacs; it is coherent in that respect for the
>> general "go backward before first top-level" case.  i see no need to
>> change it.

To see the consistency, compare:

         | elisp | outline |
         |-------+---------|
         | C-M-a | C-c C-p |
         | C-M-e | C-c C-n |

So now I believe...

> However, C-M-e can then move back to the defun while C-c C-f
> ('outline-forward-same-level') won't, i.e. users are trapped in the
> area above the first heading.
>
> So it needs fixing, one way or the other. But for consistency, fixing
> C-c C-f is acceptable also.

the behavior with Chong's patch is more correct.

-- 
Leo <sdl.web AT gmail.com>                         (GPG Key: 9283AA3F)