[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:23:00 -0400 |
(3) Modify the emacs insert/delete primitives to do the job, e.g.,
they could look for a variable like `inhibit-undo', and if
non-nil, fixup buffer-undo-list to account for the new operation
instead of actually recording the new operation in it.
This seems like a good feature to perhaps add.
However, it occurs to me that the insertion of text (such as, new
warnings) uses rather little space in an undo list. So I wonder how
it happened that the undo list in the warnings buffer got big enough
to trigger the warning. Did that really happen?
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, (continued)
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Glenn Morris, 2007/03/28
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/29
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, David Kastrup, 2007/03/29
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/30
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Glenn Morris, 2007/03/30
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/03/30
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/31
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Glenn Morris, 2007/03/31
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/31
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Miles Bader, 2007/03/29
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Glenn Morris, 2007/03/30
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Miles Bader, 2007/03/30
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/31
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Miles Bader, 2007/03/31
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Miles Bader, 2007/03/31
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/29