[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:59:40 -0400 |
I don't think it is a good idea to let-bind buffer-undo-list here:
instead it should generally be set to t in the buffer.
Otherwise undo information will be recorded sparsely (for example, for
user input), leading to inconsistent results.
That was my first reaction, but then it occurred to me that recording
undo info only for user editing might be just the right thing.
- The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/03/24
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/25
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Glenn Morris, 2007/03/27
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, David Kastrup, 2007/03/28
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Glenn Morris, 2007/03/28
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, David Kastrup, 2007/03/29
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/30
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Glenn Morris, 2007/03/30
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/03/30
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/31
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Glenn Morris, 2007/03/31
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/31
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Miles Bader, 2007/03/29
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/30
- Re: The *Warnings* buffer and undo, Glenn Morris, 2007/03/30