|
From: | Sam Steingold |
Subject: | Re: Change in process.c |
Date: | Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:02:39 -0400 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) |
Nick Roberts wrote:
> /* For some reason, this sleep() prevents Emacs from sending > loadavg to 5-8(!) for ~10 seconds. > See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/67722 or > http://www.google.com/search?q=busyloop+in+sigchld_handler */ Links that might disappear, and searches whose results will change, as commentsdoesn't seem a good idea.
the link will not disappear any more than a "gnu.org" link will. if you have a better link, please add it.
Can't the reason for the change be summarised in situ?
it is summarized: "or some reason, this sleep() prevents Emacs from sending loadavg to 5-8(!) for ~10 seconds". 40 messages of various conjectures, claims, counterclaims, rebuttals &c are long but of dubious value inside the source code.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |