[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Change in process.c
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: Change in process.c |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:33:49 +1200 |
> > the system stops responding, loadavg goes to 5-8(!), CPU is 100% busy.
> > this lasts for ~10 seconds.
>
> Does this happen on _any_ other system but yours?
Also my old machine says (hard problems on my newer one - you were right!):
This function is obsolete. Use nanosleep(2) or setitimer(2) instead.
2001-04-02 USLEEP(3)
^^^^
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
- Change in process.c, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/26
- Re: Change in process.c, Sam Steingold, 2007/03/26
- Re: Change in process.c, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/27
- Re: Change in process.c,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: Change in process.c, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/27
- Re: Change in process.c, Chong Yidong, 2007/03/27
- Re: Change in process.c, Nick Roberts, 2007/03/27
- Re: Change in process.c, Sam Steingold, 2007/03/28
- Re: Change in process.c, Nick Roberts, 2007/03/28
- Re: Change in process.c, Sam Steingold, 2007/03/28
- Re: Change in process.c, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/28
- Re: Change in process.c, Sam Steingold, 2007/03/28
- Re: Change in process.c, Jan Djärv, 2007/03/28
- Re: Change in process.c, Kim F. Storm, 2007/03/28