|
From: | Kim F. Storm |
Subject: | Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler |
Date: | Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:34:40 +0100 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes: > address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes: > >> That's what the doc says, but that's not what the 2.4 Linux kernel >> code seems to be doing (I included the relevant snippet of sys_wait4 >> in my previous message). > > The snippet exactly matches the intented behaviour. Traced processes are > only reported when !WUNTRACED. So it is "intended behaviour" vs. "documented behaviour". The man pages talks about "stopped processes" -- it doesn't mention (un)traced processes at all. -- Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |