[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:15:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:
> address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
>
>> Why do we care about stopped processes?
>
> It is one of the possible states of a process, see process-status. Any
> job control shell need to be able to handle that.
Yes, but how does a stopped process cause a sigchld signal to be sent
to the parent?
Because it is 'kill -9'ed while stopped, perhaps?
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, (continued)
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/13
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, David Kastrup, 2007/03/14
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Kim F. Storm, 2007/03/14
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, David Kastrup, 2007/03/14
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/14
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, David Kastrup, 2007/03/14
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/14
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, David Kastrup, 2007/03/14
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/14
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/14
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/14
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Kim F. Storm, 2007/03/14
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/14
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Kim F. Storm, 2007/03/14
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/14
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Kim F. Storm, 2007/03/16
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/16
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/13
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, David Kastrup, 2007/03/14
Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2007/03/25