[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Mar 2007 05:50:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux) |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>>> If that's the standard texbook.tex from CTAN, I have it. FWIW, I
>>> don't see any special problem with it in "emacs -Q". JIT stealth
>>> still takes 1-3% of CPU on a 3GHz box, when this file is the only one
>>> loaded in a session.
>>
>> I get similar effects with other files (not just TeX files, C mode has
>> shown similar problems in some iterations), and if you had followed
>> the discussion closely, you'd have realized that several other
>> developers have disabled jit-lock-stealth-time previously for their
>> own problems using it.
>
> What OS do you use? How much memory you have?
Ubuntu GNU/Linux, 384kB.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, (continued)
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/03/03
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/03
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/03/04
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/03/04
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/04
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/03/04
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Miles Bader, 2007/03/06
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Miles Bader, 2007/03/07
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/03/08
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/04
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/03/05
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/03