[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time |
Date: |
Sun, 04 Mar 2007 09:42:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.94 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> I mostly use very fast (3 Ghz) machines nowadays, which are not easily
> forced into annoying delays. I could try to find a slower machine,
> but I need to know what is the clock speed we consider as
> ``reference'' for such investigations. That is, with what slow clock
> speeds we would still like Emacs to be reasonably responsive?
>
> I don't know. I have not kept track of things like that for 15 years.
>
> But I think that if NONE of the developers now finds this annoying,
> that problem will be rare enough that it doesn't count for much.
>
> So we can set jit-lock-stealth-time to nil.
>
> Would someone please do that?
I have done that and changed the NEWS entry accordingly, too.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, (continued)
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/03/04
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/04
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/03/04
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Miles Bader, 2007/03/06
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/03/06
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Miles Bader, 2007/03/07
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/03/08
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/04
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/03/05
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/03