[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: transpose-sexps
From: |
Stuart D. Herring |
Subject: |
Re: transpose-sexps |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:48:28 -0800 (PST) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.8-2.el3.7lanl |
> Put this in *scratch*, put point over `f' letter and hit C-M-t:
>
> "t" "f"
>
> I get this:
>
> "tf" ""
>
> which I consider utterly improper. Moreover, it differs from what
> I get by M-t.
See the doc:
Like M-t but applies to sexps.
Does not work on a sexp that point is in the middle of
if it is a list or string.
It assumes that you are outside of strings or lists, so it saw
" "
and
f
as your two sexps, and exchanged them. It's just confusing that it looks
like the f was moved into the other string.
Davis
--
This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during
shipping.
- transpose-sexps, Paul Pogonyshev, 2007/01/04
- Re: transpose-sexps,
Stuart D. Herring <=
- Re: transpose-sexps, Paul Pogonyshev, 2007/01/04
- Re: transpose-sexps, Stuart D. Herring, 2007/01/04
- Re: transpose-sexps, Andreas Schwab, 2007/01/04
- Re: transpose-sexps, Paul Pogonyshev, 2007/01/04
- Re: transpose-sexps, Miles Bader, 2007/01/05
- Re: transpose-sexps, Paul Pogonyshev, 2007/01/05
- Re: transpose-sexps, Stuart D. Herring, 2007/01/08
- Re: transpose-sexps, Paul Pogonyshev, 2007/01/08
- Re: transpose-sexps, Stuart D. Herring, 2007/01/08
- Re: transpose-sexps, Stefan Monnier, 2007/01/08