[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS repository synchronization for RefTeX
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: CVS repository synchronization for RefTeX |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:00:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> I would rather have the maintenance of RefTeX done in the Emacs
> repository.
The people most likely to maintain it actively in future are AUCTeX
developers. Almost no maintenance has happened in the Emacs
repository up to now.
RefTeX is released standalone (unsynchronized with Emacs releases),
and creating its tarballs and stuff requires Makefiles and similar
that are not present in the Emacs tree.
RefTeX also is maintained for XEmacs. What we have in Emacs is just a
fraction of the whole of RefTeX.
I don't think that maintaining the whole in the Emacs repository is
likely to lead to the best results, since RefTeX is not released just
for Emacs, and even should work with more than one Emacs version.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: CVS repository synchronization for RefTeX, (continued)
- Re: CVS repository synchronization for RefTeX, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/30
- Re: CVS repository synchronization for RefTeX, Ralf Angeli, 2006/12/30
- Re: CVS repository synchronization for RefTeX, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/30
- Re: CVS repository synchronization for RefTeX, Reiner Steib, 2006/12/30
- Re: CVS repository synchronization for RefTeX, Ralf Angeli, 2006/12/31
- Re: CVS repository synchronization for RefTeX, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/30
Re: CVS repository synchronization for RefTeX, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/29
- Re: CVS repository synchronization for RefTeX,
David Kastrup <=