Re: National Language Support Functions

[Juanma Barranquero]

On 12/29/06, Lennart Borgman <address@hidden> wrote:

> I have already said I agreed.

Yes. My mind was wandering around, lost in the concept of awfulness,
and I got carried away. Sorry.

> I have no intention of making my Emacs binary distribution be different
> from Emacs default if I can avoid it.

Of course. But your threshold for deciding that it cannot be avoided
doesn't seem hard to reach.

> The purpose of my binary distribution was (as I several times has said)
> to make it more easy to get Emacs up and running on w32. I was surprised
> that it was so difficult and time consuming.

Compiling Emacs on Windows can be time-consuming. Setting it up is not IMHO.

                   /L/e/k/t/u