[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: National Language Support Functions
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: National Language Support Functions |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Dec 2006 20:37:31 +0100 |
On 12/29/06, Lennart Borgman (gmail) <address@hidden> wrote:
It would be very good if we continued this discussion.
And if no agreement can be reached, will you add another patch to your
binary Emacs distribution and make it still more divergent, or will
you accept that perhaps it is better to leave it as it stands now?
/L/e/k/t/u
- Re: National Language Support Functions, (continued)
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/29
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2006/12/29
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/29
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2006/12/29
- Re: National Language Support Functions,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/29
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/29
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2006/12/29
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/29
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2006/12/29
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/29
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2006/12/29
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/29
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2006/12/29
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/29