[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pretest
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: Pretest |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Nov 2006 00:44:29 +1300 |
Telling them that they should stop doing so and revert to some earlier
stage would require agreement on just what this earlier state should
be. "non-working" is what you demand.
I'm not telling people what to do, or demanding anything. I'm just saying that
I don't it is appropriate to delay things for further improvements to
emacsclient on Windows. If you're going to sum up, at least do it accurately.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
- Re: Pretest, (continued)
- Re: Pretest, Nick Roberts, 2006/11/18
- Re: Pretest, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/11/18
- Re: Pretest, Nick Roberts, 2006/11/18
- Re: Pretest, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/11/18
- Re: Pretest, Nick Roberts, 2006/11/18
- Re: Pretest, David Kastrup, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Nick Roberts, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, David Kastrup, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: Pretest, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, David Kastrup, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Lennart Borgman, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, David Kastrup, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Lennart Borgman, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, David Kastrup, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Stefan Monnier, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Jason Rumney, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Lennart Borgman, 2006/11/19