[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pretest
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: Pretest |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:03:37 +1300 |
> > > We are currently working with emacsclient. It would be very good if our
> > > changes in emacsclient were included in the pretest. We need a little
> > > bit more time for resolving some issues and for testing.
> >
> > It sounds like it's too late. If the issues can't be resolved
> > quickly perhaps the changes should be reverted.
>
> What sense is in reverting changes if it is too late?
Too late to include changes in a pretest that is already out! The changes were
made after the first pretest for a bug that was deemed non-critical by Richard.
It seems a bit rich to ask for more time a month later. If it's quicker to
revert them than to resolve then that seems to make sense to me.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
- Pretest, (continued)
- Pretest, Chong Yidong, 2006/11/18
- Re: Pretest, Lennart Borgman, 2006/11/18
- Re: Pretest, Nick Roberts, 2006/11/18
- Re: Pretest, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/11/18
- Re: Pretest, Nick Roberts, 2006/11/18
- Re: Pretest, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/11/18
- Re: Pretest, Nick Roberts, 2006/11/18
- Re: Pretest, David Kastrup, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: Pretest, David Kastrup, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Nick Roberts, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, David Kastrup, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Lennart Borgman, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, David Kastrup, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Lennart Borgman, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, David Kastrup, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Stefan Monnier, 2006/11/19