[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs and GFortran
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs and GFortran |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Nov 2006 21:40:39 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
> With the "simple" patch
>
> === gfortran Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes 12734
> # of unexpected failures 2171
> # of expected failures 7
> # of unsupported tests 73
If your test suites rely on a non-standard error-reporting format,
bringing the format into standards-compliance will obviously break the
test suites; but the bug here doesn't lie in the standards-compliance.
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, (continued)
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/11/01
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Stefan Monnier, 2006/11/01
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/01
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/11/01
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/01
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/11/01
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/01
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/11/01
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/01
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/11/01
- Re: Emacs and GFortran,
Chong Yidong <=
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, David Kastrup, 2006/11/03
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/11/03
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Chong Yidong, 2006/11/02
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/02
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Thomas Koenig, 2006/11/02
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/11/02
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, David Kastrup, 2006/11/03
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/11/03
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Thomas Koenig, 2006/11/03
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/11/03