Re: Build failure under Suse 10.0

[Chong Yidong]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

>> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:29:52 +0100
>> From: "Juanma Barranquero" <address@hidden>
>> Cc: address@hidden
>> 
>> And, after all, we've been years waiting for the pretest. I don't
>> think a few days will make much difference.
>
> FWIW, I don't see any reasons to hurry with another pretest.  AFAIR,
> we didn't yet hear from enough pretesters to have a clear idea of how
> many bugs are there, especially on unusual platforms.

For one thing, Richard hasn't sent out his announcement to the
emacs-pretesters list.  I suggested to him to hold off making the
announcement: since 22.0.90 contains some obvious bugs that prevent
compilation on Windows, Mac, and OpenBSD, I think it's better to put
out a 22.0.91 tarball fixing this problems, so that testers won't
waste time reporting trivial "Emacs can't compile" bugs that are fixed
in CVS.

Do you disagree?