[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another keybinding nit for afterwards
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Another keybinding nit for afterwards |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:42:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> The need for a poll about a proposed change has nothing to do with
> how much WORK it takes to implement the change. It is because an
> incompatible change can make users unhappy.
But the question was how much work it was doing a poll. Kim explained
some of that: talking out which options to offer at a poll would be
what could be distracting now.
Implementing the change should be rather trivial, checking the callers
and seeing where their interactive arguments should likely be made to
follow suit is more work, changing the documentation throughout even
more, in particular since translations of refcard/tutorial might be
involved.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Another keybinding nit for afterwards, (continued)