Re: delete-process bug

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: address@hidden (Kim F. Storm)
> Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 10:22:13 +0200
> Cc: Agustin Martin <address@hidden>,
>       Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> 
> I also saw how MS-Windows handles process termination without SIGCHLD.
> Actually, it would do harm if SIGCHLD was ever defined on MS-Windows,
> so perhaps we should explicitly add something like this after
> all includes:
> 
> 
> /* MS-Windows has its own way of detecting process termination.
>    It does not normally define SIGCHLD, but just in case...  */
> #ifdef WINDOWSNT
> #undef SIGCHLD
> #endif

??? The Windows port already defines SIGCHLD (on src/s/ms-w32.h) and
uses that definition in w32proc.c, in the fragment I've shown and
elsewhere.

Where did you see that defining SIGCHLD on Windows will do harm?  If
it does, we already have that harm.