[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: delete-process bug
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: delete-process bug |
Date: |
Mon, 29 May 2006 06:32:24 +0300 |
> From: address@hidden (Kim F. Storm)
> Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 23:15:58 +0200
> Cc: Agustin Martin <address@hidden>,
> Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> But I also wonder if any of the async process stuff actually works
> without SIGCHLD ?!? Are there any systems which support async processes
> but don't have SIGCHLD?
AFAIK, MS-Windows is such a system. (I didn't track this discussion,
so I don't know if the Windows case is relevant to it.)
- Re: delete-process bug, (continued)
- Re: delete-process bug, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, David Kastrup, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: delete-process bug, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/30
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/30