[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: M-g in dired
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: M-g in dired |
Date: |
Sat, 20 May 2006 01:03:55 -0400 |
What about M-t (and M-T)
.. transpose-words is useless in dired buffers.
I would not object to using M-t for this.
Miles wrote:
I like M-j (and M-J): "J" is for "jump", and mirrors similar bindings
used in gnus.
[The global binding for M-j is similarly useless in dired.]
I think that is more logical than M-t. And more convenient than
a two-character key.
So let's switch to M-j in Dired.
Thanks.
- Re: M-g in dired, Richard Stallman, 2006/05/18
- Re: M-g in dired, Richard Stallman, 2006/05/20
- Re: M-g in dired, Juri Linkov, 2006/05/21
- Re: M-g in dired, Richard Stallman, 2006/05/21
- Re: M-g in dired, Juri Linkov, 2006/05/22
- Re: M-g in dired, Richard Stallman, 2006/05/22
- Re: M-g in dired, Juri Linkov, 2006/05/23