[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: macos.texi updated
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: macos.texi updated |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Oct 2005 14:16:55 -0400 |
You're right.. But the population of "power users" in this case for
whatever reason seems fairly large (just subjective impression), and
the requirement to learn XLFD (to compose a fontset, or whatever
else) and partake of the pleasures of asterisk-counting seems onerous.
Is there a suitable font specification syntax in some other app that
we could imitate? I don't think it is worth while for us to develop a
new one, and if it were unique to Emacs, it probably would not be very
useful.
XLFD should be removed from non-window-system-specific code and
replaced with a simple struct containing the same information.
That is not a user interface proposal. That is a proposal for a
simplification of internals of Emacs. Maybe that would be a
simplification, maybe not. In either case, I would rather we NOT
change this now.
But it has nothing to do with the idea of presenting a different
_syntax_ for specifying a font, so I think it is just a distraction
from the issue we were talking about.
- Re: macos.texi updated, Adrian Robert, 2005/10/07
- Re: macos.texi updated,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: macos.texi updated, Adrian Robert, 2005/10/10
- Re: macos.texi updated, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/11
- Re: macos.texi updated, David Reitter, 2005/10/11
- Re: macos.texi updated, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/12
- Re: macos.texi updated, Adrian Robert, 2005/10/18
- Re: macos.texi updated, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/20
- Re: macos.texi updated, Adrian Robert, 2005/10/24
- Re: macos.texi updated, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/25
- Re: macos.texi updated, Stefan Monnier, 2005/10/10
- Re: macos.texi updated, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2005/10/11