Re: address@hidden: Kill ring leak in winemacs macros]

[Jason Rumney]

Stuart D. Herring wrote:

> I realize I never did implement this -- can I get some opinions on which
> of these approaches to follow?  So far my reasoning is that the
> execute-kbd-macro path is simpler and cleaner, but the kill-functions path
> is more transparent (as well as having the trivial advantage that it would
> remain possible to permanently affect the interprogram-*-functions
> variables from a keyboard macro).
>  
I'm not convinced this change is a good one. What if your macro involves 
a call-process call to an external program that interacts with Emacs via 
the keyboard?