[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A few questions about desktop.el
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: A few questions about desktop.el |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 11:59:35 +0200 |
On 8/9/05, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> I tend to use make-variable-buffer-local when a variable is tracking
> some state of a buffer, such that it would always be an error if two
> buffers shared such a variable.
Sure. For example, any variable that tracks something related to
external characteristics of the buffer (or the buffer's associated
file, if any) must usually be automatically buffer-local.
In the case at hand, I think most buffers will want the same
`desktop-locals-to-save'. I can imagine buffer X in mode M wanting to
save its value of LOCAL-VAR-1, and buffer Y also in mode M wanting to
save its own LOCAL-VAR-1, but it will be less frequent for buffer X to
want to save LOCAL-VAR-1 and for buffer Y *not* wanting to save it.
--
/L/e/k/t/u
- Re: A few questions about desktop.el, Lars Hansen, 2005/08/08
- Re: A few questions about desktop.el, Lars Hansen, 2005/08/08
- Re: A few questions about desktop.el, Lars Hansen, 2005/08/10
- Re: A few questions about desktop.el, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/08/10
- Re: A few questions about desktop.el, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/08/10
- Re: A few questions about desktop.el, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/08/10
- Re: A few questions about desktop.el, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/08/10
- Re: A few questions about desktop.el, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/08/10
- Re: A few questions about desktop.el, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/08/10
- Re: A few questions about desktop.el, Lars Hansen, 2005/08/11