[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Diff mode faces
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Diff mode faces |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jul 2005 06:33:15 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:46:43 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> >> Maybe the shadow face should be fixed instead.
>
> > Why? It does what it's supposed to do: makes the text barely visible.
>
> Then why isn't it good for the `diff-context' face?
Well, I didn't suggest to change it in the first place, so I really am
not the man to ask. I guess the idea is that diff context needs to be
readable after all.
> Or more specifically, why is it only good for `diff-context' on color
> terminals with more than 88 colors?
Probably because, with more than 88 colors, the shadow face is more
readable than the current color on 16- and 8-color tty's.
> It should work just fine on gray-level terminals
Yes, those should need a separate definition, if we change the current
one.
> and if the result is completely unreadable on terminals with less
> than 88 colors, thenwhy shouldn't that problem also be fixed for the
> `shadow' face?
It's not ``completely unreadable'', at least not in my opinion.
- Re: Diff mode faces, (continued)
- Re: Diff mode faces, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/05
- Re: Diff mode faces, Juri Linkov, 2005/07/06
- Re: Diff mode faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/07/06
- Re: Diff mode faces, Juri Linkov, 2005/07/09
- Re: Diff mode faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/07/09
- Re: Diff mode faces, Juri Linkov, 2005/07/11
- Re: Diff mode faces, Stefan Monnier, 2005/07/11
- Re: Diff mode faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/07/11
- Re: Diff mode faces, Stefan Monnier, 2005/07/11
- Re: Diff mode faces,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Diff mode faces, Juri Linkov, 2005/07/12
- Re: Diff mode faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/07/16
- Re: Diff mode faces, Miles Bader, 2005/07/07
- Re: Diff mode faces, Juri Linkov, 2005/07/07