[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities.
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities. |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:56:10 -0500 (CDT) |
Richard Stallman wrote:
The problem is that try-completion and friends try to handle both
lists of symbols and anonymous lambda expressions.
Looking at the code, I don't think they do. It does not try to
handle a list of symbols--and, because of the conflict you mentioned,
it should not try.
I think we should document that a simple list of symbols is NOT
allowed, but that you can add "" as the first element to make that
list into a legitimate completion table.
But what about the other problem I mentioned. Should
`test-completion' not one way or the other be made consistent with
`try-completion' and `all-completions'. Kim adapted the latter two to
handle symbols in alists and hash tables, but not test-completion.
Thereby, the former symmetry between the three is gone.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities., (continued)
- Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities., Miles Bader, 2005/06/30
- Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities., Kim F. Storm, 2005/06/30
- Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities., Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/30
- Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities., Stefan Monnier, 2005/06/30
- Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities., Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/30
- Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities., Stefan Monnier, 2005/06/30
- Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities., Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/30
- Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities., Stefan Monnier, 2005/06/30
- Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities., Kim F. Storm, 2005/06/30
- Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities., Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/30
Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities.,
Luc Teirlinck <=