[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Matches for multiline regexps
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Matches for multiline regexps |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:00:10 -0400 |
> The current duplicating of context lines of consecutive matched lines
> is too inconvenient.
>
> Inconvenient for whom? The user, or the maintainers of occur?
For the user. grep and diff don't duplicate context lines,
for good reasons.
I can see both advantages and disadvantages, for the user. THe
advantage I see in listing each match separately is that you can see
how many matches there are, and where each one starts and ends.
For some regexps that might not always be obvious.
However, I am not sure this advantage is important enough to base the
decision on.
(BTW, there are separate packages extending occur, such as moccur.el
which could be integrated into Emacs later).
Could you tell me about moccur.el, so I can think about it
for the future?
- Re: Matches for multiline regexps, (continued)
- Re: Matches for multiline regexps, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/15
- Re: Matches for multiline regexps, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/15
- Re: Matches for multiline regexps, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/16
- Re: Matches for multiline regexps, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/16
- Re: Matches for multiline regexps, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/17
- Re: Matches for multiline regexps, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/17
- Re: Matches for multiline regexps, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/18
- Re: Matches for multiline regexps, Juri Linkov, 2005/06/19
- Re: Matches for multiline regexps, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/19
- Re: Matches for multiline regexps, Juri Linkov, 2005/06/20
- Re: Matches for multiline regexps,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Matches for multiline regexps, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/19
- Re: Matches for multiline regexps, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/20
- Re: Matches for multiline regexps, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/17
Re: Matches for multiline regexps, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/16