[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: search-whitespace-regexp
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: search-whitespace-regexp |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 09:01:49 +0900 |
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 16:07:44 -0500, Stefan Monnier
<address@hidden> wrote:
> > AFAICT everybody is happy
> > with the behavior where a space in the search text is interpreted as
> > "any
> > sequence of blank chars".
>
> > Do you mean, everyone would be happy if a space in string search text
> > were interpreted that way?
>
> Yes. Especially if the regexp-search (in contrast) doesn't use such magic.
> This way, you can easily turn off the magic (by using regexp-search) for
> those rare cases where you really want to match "just one space".
That seems bizarre. Using a regexp search would just mess things up
more. Those cases where one wants a search to be exact are hardly
going to be the ones where you just want to pop into regexp mode!
[Not to mention, I suspect it will not be immediately obvious that
searches are more fuzzy than intended.]
Anyway, the statement that "everybody would be happy" is clearly wrong.
-Miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
- Re: search-whitespace-regexp, (continued)
- Re: search-whitespace-regexp, Stefan Monnier, 2005/02/06
- Re: search-whitespace-regexp, Miles Bader, 2005/02/06
- RE: search-whitespace-regexp, Drew Adams, 2005/02/06
- Re: search-whitespace-regexp, Miles Bader, 2005/02/06
- Re: search-whitespace-regexp, Chong Yidong, 2005/02/06
- RE: search-whitespace-regexp, Drew Adams, 2005/02/06
- Re: search-whitespace-regexp, Andreas Schwab, 2005/02/07
- Re: search-whitespace-regexp, Richard Stallman, 2005/02/07
- Re: search-whitespace-regexp, Richard Stallman, 2005/02/07
- Re: search-whitespace-regexp, Stefan Monnier, 2005/02/07
- Re: search-whitespace-regexp,
Miles Bader <=