Re: Emacs 21.4

[David Kastrup]

Nick Roberts <address@hidden> writes:

>  > What needs to be done now?
>  > 
>  ...
>
>  > b) In the CVS version, the version number should likely get
>  > bumped to 22.0.50 instead of the current 21.3.50.  There is no
>  > sense in making it 21.4.50, anyhow, and it would be quite
>  > misleading to have it stay at 21.3.50, lower than the current
>  > released version.
>  > 
>  > c) all references to 21.4 need to be replaced by referring to
>  > 22.1 in our CVS.
>
>  ...
>
> Constructing such a plan only makes sense if you are prepared to
> accept that it might be ignored completely.

That's what point "e)" was for.  Anyway, this _is_ all about
minimizing the negative impact of a future potentially uncoordinated
release.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum