[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: y-or-n-p-with-timeout
From: |
Matthew Mundell |
Subject: |
Re: y-or-n-p-with-timeout |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:04:15 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> > Type-break mode with fixed-length periods between breaks could use
> > such a function to prompt the user to take a break. That way if the
> > user returns to the machine after an extended period away, then any
> > prompting will, correctly, be gone.
> >
> > Would we want type-break mode to use a dialog box?
>
> The same situation would then be a case for the dialog box to time
> out. Using a dialog box would require an alternative for terminal
> display.
>
> We're failing to communicate. The question is whether this is
> a real example of wanting to use a dialog box.
So this question is separate from y-or-n-p-with-timeout?
> Do we really want type-break to use a dialog box?
A dialog makes the prompt more aggressive, by covering some of the
frame. It also requires the use of the mouse, to respond to the
prompt.
> Does type-break now use a dialog box?
It uses the value of `type-break-query-function', which is set to
`yes-or-no-p'.
It can be customised to use a dialog box, for example as follows.
(setq type-break-query-function
(lambda (msg)
(x-popup-dialog t `(,msg ("yes" . t) ("no" . nil)))))
- Re: y-or-n-p-with-timeout, (continued)
- Re: y-or-n-p-with-timeout, Stefan, 2004/11/08
- Re: y-or-n-p-with-timeout, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/09
- Re: y-or-n-p-with-timeout, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/11/09
- Re: y-or-n-p-with-timeout, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/10
- Re: y-or-n-p-with-timeout, Jan D., 2004/11/11
- Re: y-or-n-p-with-timeout, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/12
Re: y-or-n-p-with-timeout, Matthew Mundell, 2004/11/08
Re: y-or-n-p-with-timeout, Jan D., 2004/11/06