[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:20:48 +0200 |
> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:41:26 +0200 (MEST)
> From: "Alexander Pohoyda" <address@hidden>
>
> The problem is that we have to do this
> after the mail is reformated, but there is no valid MIME message after
> the rmail-reformat-message call: the message is broken into two parts
> by the EOOH marker.
> To be able to MIME-parse it, I have to glue the message back and
> delete the "simplified" header in between.
I don't understand why is it important to have the message in its
original pre-`rmail-reformat-message' form. All the necessary MIME
information is still there, part of it before EOOH, part of it
after. So you ought to be able to figure out how to process the
message, right? What am I missing?
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, (continued)
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Kenichi Handa, 2003/10/13
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, David Kastrup, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Alexander Pohoyda, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/17
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Ehud Karni, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/10/16
- Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/16
Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/16