[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug in forward-visible-line: Patch
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: bug in forward-visible-line: Patch |
Date: |
Thu, 22 May 2003 17:03:45 -0500 (CDT) |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
Don't reinvent the wheel: implement it in C where it's
already available (and so you're sure it really works the
same). The C version return 0 1 or 2 so you can also tell
whether it's got an ellipsis or not.
This is somewhat ambiguous. I believe you do not mean "implement it in
C" but "it is already implemented in C". In the latter case I guess it
would be easy to make it callable from Lisp, which would be useful.
I might have misunderstood your previous mail. Was your cond form
intended as a blueprint for a Lisp function (which would also have
reinvented the wheel) or as a suggested change in actual behavior?
Sincerely,
Luc.
- bug in forward-visible-line: Patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/22
- Re: bug in forward-visible-line: Patch, David Kastrup, 2003/05/23
- Re: bug in forward-visible-line: Patch, Miles Bader, 2003/05/23
- Re: bug in forward-visible-line: Patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/23
- Re: bug in forward-visible-line: Patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/24
- Re: bug in forward-visible-line: Patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/23
- Re: bug in forward-visible-line: Patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/23
Re: bug in forward-visible-line: Patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/22