Re: W32 question - hide/show system caret

[John Covici]

I am still here although behind in the list -- I can test such a
thing, but I cannot compile the latest version (03/27/03), I get the
following error.

) Program Maintenance Utility   Version 6.00.8168.0
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp 1988-1998. All rights reserved.

        "d:\emacs\leim/../src/obj-spd/i386/emacs.exe" -batch --no-init-file 
--no-site-file --multibyte -l d:/emacs/leim/../lisp/international/titdic-cnv  
--eval "(batch-titdic-convert t)"  -dir quail ./CXTERM-DIC
Converting all tit files in the directory d:/emacs/leim/CXTERM-DIC
Converting d:/emacs/leim/CXTERM-DIC/4Corner.tit to quail-package...
Invalid ENCODE: value in TIT dictionary
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"d:\emacs\leim/../src/obj-spd/i386/emacs.exe"' : 
return code '0xffffffff'
Stop.
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"D:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual 
Studio\VC98\bin\NMAKE.EXE"' : return code '0x2'
Stop.

Thanks.


on 20 Mar 2003 09:03:00 +0000 Jason Rumney <address@hidden> wrote:

> address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
>
>> During my merging of X/W32/MAC I found what I think is sub-optimal code:
>> 
>> In w32term.c, the system caret is hidden and shown in the hooks
>> x_update_window_begin and x_update_window_end, i.e. once for each
>> updated emacs window.
>> 
>> Wouldn't it be simpler and more efficient to move the hide/show into
>> x_update_begin and x_update_end, i.e. only once for each updated emacs
>> frame ?
>
> Yes, probably. It will need testing with screen reader software
> though. Are there still people on this list that can test this if Kim
> or me make this change?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

-- 
         John Covici
         address@hidden