[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gtk version getting closer
From: |
Jan D. |
Subject: |
Re: Gtk version getting closer |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Nov 2002 10:02:42 +0100 (MET) |
>
> > From: "Jan D." <address@hidden>
> > Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 20:39:07 +0100 (CET)
> >
> > This port tries to reuse as much as it can of current X code, so
> > it is very dependent on X. For example, all drawing is done with
> > standard X calls. The event loop is mostly unmodified (split into
> > two functions, but no major code changes).
>
> Does this mean the code won't work with the Windows port of Gtk?
I assume it does not work with MS Windows. X specific calls in Gtk
are used, as well as a lot of X calls in the ordinary Emacs code for X.
The goal has been to reuse as much code unchanged as possible (see
http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/2001-December/004383.html).
Since I don't do MS Windows I don't know what effort would
be required to make it work. If one used only Gtk code instead of
Xlib I assume it would run on MS Windows as well. This is what I
started to do, but then changed to the current X specific approach.
Jan D.
- Re: Gtk version getting closer, (continued)
- Re: Gtk version getting closer, Robert J. Chassell, 2002/11/21
- Re: Gtk version getting closer, Kenichi Handa, 2002/11/21
- Re: Gtk version getting closer, Miles Bader, 2002/11/21
- Re: Gtk version getting closer, Jason Rumney, 2002/11/21
- Re: Gtk version getting closer, Jason Rumney, 2002/11/15
- Re: Gtk version getting closer, David Masterson, 2002/11/15
Re: Gtk version getting closer, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/11/09
- Re: Gtk version getting closer,
Jan D. <=
Re: Gtk version getting closer, jasonr, 2002/11/08
Re: Gtk version getting closer, jasonr, 2002/11/21